Why Muting Anti-Zionist Fringe Voices is Necessary

What’s happening: In the robust conversation concerning Israel, a persistent cadre of anti-Zionist Jewish individuals and groups exploit their Jewish identities to assail Israel and propagate division. Historically, opponents have concealed their animus toward Jews using the veneer of political activism. However, as advocates supporters of Israel, counteracting this narrative is key by focusing on the central, often-dismissed narrative: the strong, affirming bond between Jews worldwide and Israel.

Why it matters:

The survival and prosperity of Jewish communities in the diaspora are intrinsically linked to the future of Israel. Recognizing these detracting voices as unrepresentative of the broader Jewish opinion is crucial. This is critical to upholding the well-being and safety of the Jewish collective.

The three core issues:

Skipping this minority preserves Jewish unity:

Radical groups use their heritage to attack Israel, unintentionally becoming stooges for age-old anti-Semitism. Thriving diaspora life is contingent upon Israel’s robust standing. It’s pivotal to align our attitudes with this reality, ensuring that well-meaning activism does not propel harmful anti-Semitic agendas. These groups, albeit outspoken, are peripheral and do not embody the diverse, pro-Israel Jewish community.

“Token” Jews in institutions are dangerous for Jewish consensus:

When Jewish anti-Zionist figures are appointed to roles purporting to address anti-Semitism, it risks misshaping the very definition integral to protecting our people. Listening to the majority of Jews, whose identity is inherently linked with Israel, and excluding radical opinions, would align institutions with truth and justice. Elevating solely anti-Israel voices instills a perpetual double standard that amalgamates anti-Israeli sentiment with anti-Semitism, introducing risks for all Jews.

Anti-Israel stances cripple prospects for genuine peace:

Legitimizing radical left-wing ideals masked as pro-Palestinian activism promotes a reductionist view of global dynamics, slandering Israel uniquely. This does not align with most Jews’ hopes for peace but instead spokes the wheels of time-worn anti-Jewish sentiment under the guise of modern activism. Shedding light on these individuals and groups is essential for preserving the Jewish future.

The discussion about Israel should reflect the broad Jewish consensus—a truth aligned with historical belonging, cultural depth, and perpetual aspiration for a peaceful coexistence.

Considering the larger perspective:

This must readjust our focus to uphold diaspora Jews’ right to self-determine a Zionist narrative while enabling them to advocate for themselves intelligently and proactively.

This story was first published on jpost.com.