What it’s about
Syrian rebel leader Ahmad al-Sharaa, in a landmark address to Israel, declared Syria’s commitment to maintain the disengagement accord from 1974, which followed the Yom Kippur War. This was his first message directed at Israel.
Why it matters
This development is significant as it highlights Syria’s intention of fostering stability and peace in the region. Al-Sharaa’s position indicates a potential shift towards prioritizing state-building and public institution development in Syria, reflecting a movement away from the legacy of conflict with Israel.
Background
In his communication with journalists, al-Sharaa criticized Israeli military activities within territories recognized internationally as a buffer zone according to the 1974 UN-monitored disengagement agreement. Yet, Israel responded that these measures are purely defensive, aiming to prevent armed aggression and protect its citizens in the Golan Heights.
Israel’s Perspective
From Israel’s point of view, these defensive measures are necessary to counter threats from groups linked to Hezbollah and Iran. Ensuring the security of its borders remains a primary concern, especially given the volatile situation in neighboring regions.
Path to Future Cooperation
Al-Sharaa’s attempts at reclaiming his image as a political leader offer an opportunity for a shift in Syrian leadership cylinders. Meanwhile, his aspirations to run for presidency—if enough support is garnered—demonstrate a push towards a strategic reconstruction of Syria’s governance and international relations including the desire for declassification of their forces from terrorist lists by global communities like the U.S.
The Bigger Picture
Empowering moderation and governance can lead to stabilization efforts in the Middle East that might ultimately foster a more secure and peaceful coexistence between nations such as Syria and Israel. Holding onto cease-fire agreements furthers the shared vision for long-term peace and partnership.
This story was first published on ynetnews.com.