Overview

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has signaled his intent to explore forming a committee aimed at advancing the privatization of Israel’s Public Broadcasting Service, Kan. This development follows a controversial satire piece aired by the broadcaster, which has sparked significant backlash from the ruling Likud party.

Why It Matters

Privatization of Kan represents a significant policy shift that could influence the landscape of Israeli media. Currently publicly funded, Kan holds a prominent role in the national media space. Transforming it into a private entity could redefine its obligations and shift its editorial independence, aligning more closely with broader international trends toward privatization.

Driving the News

The proposal for Kan’s privatization became more tangible after a skit on its “Zehu Ze” show portrayed Netanyahu in an unfavorable light, drawing criticism from the Likud party. Likud officials have accused Kan of pursuing a partisan agenda misaligned with national interests, emphasizing their perspective that the channel operates as a platform for leftist views.

The Controversy

The Likud party initially misidentified an image involved in the skit as Netanyahu’s brother, Yoni, which intensified their claims against the broadcaster. However, Kan faced further allegations about its motives even after the correction, propelling discussions on its future direction.

Communication Minister’s Role

Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi has supported reforms to minimize public funding for such broadcasting services, streamlining a transition to privatization. He argues that enhancing private media competition aligns with democratic principles and efficient regulation.

Challenges and Resistance

Nonetheless, existing protocol challenges remain. David Bitan, head of the Knesset Economics Committee, has been a vocal opponent of Communication Minister Karhi’s initiatives, standing firm against the dismantling of traditional bipartisan oversight.

The Bigger Picture

Discussing the fate of other state-funded media, including Army Radio, aligns with a vision of increased operational efficiency and reduced state expenditure. Additionally, contemplating changes in the governance of public broadcasting could foster innovation and a more diversified media environment.

Reactions and Criticism

Civil society group Movement for Quality Government in Israel insists Netanyahu adhere strictly to conflict-of-interest protocols while questioning public motivations in reallocating broadcasting power dynamics. They have called for Attorney General intervention emphasizing maintaining principled governance and media freedom.

This story was first published on jpost.com.