What it is about
The political-security cabinet recently voted overwhelmingly in favor of continuing the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) presence in the Philadelphi Corridor. The decision, which saw eight votes in favor, one against, and one abstention, is seen as a strategic move in negotiating a potential hostage deal. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant opposed the decision, while National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir abstained.
Why it matters
The Philadelphi Corridor, situated along the border between Egypt and Gaza, has been a critical point for preventing arms smuggling into Gaza. The presence of the IDF in this corridor strengthens Israel’s security and asserts control over a significant smuggling route that has historically been exploited by terrorist organizations in Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized the importance of this decision, stating the lax control over the corridor previously allowed weapon smuggling that fueled terrorist activities.
Background
In a detailed discussion, cabinet ministers highlighted how retaining control over the Philadelphi Corridor could exert pressure on Hamas to engage in a hostage deal. Netanyahu reminded the cabinet of the past consequences when the corridor was not under Israeli control, leading to significant smuggling of arms through the Egypt-Gaza border. The defense establishment also faced criticism for previously downplaying the need for strict control.
The discussion was further charged with emotion as it touched upon the sensitive subject of hostages who had been captured and, in many tragic cases, killed. Preliminary examinations have revealed that most of the hostages were murdered in the first months of the conflict.
The Reaction of Hostages’ Relatives
The Hostages and Missing Families Forum expressed fury over the decision, accusing the government of continuing to delay reaching a comprehensive hostage deal. They pointed out that extensive demolition of Hamas tunnels in Rafah and improved guarantees from the Egyptians and Americans offered a diplomatic window that could be better leveraged without IDF presence.
Prime Minister’s Stand
Prime Minister Netanyahu’s firm stance against the removal of IDF forces from the Philadelphi Corridor was backed by a supportive cabinet. Netanyahu reiterated the necessity of a robust Israeli presence to prevent future smuggling of arms and reduce the likelihood of escalatory terrorist activities emanating from the Gaza Strip.
International Context
Recent diplomatic endeavors indicated potential compromises, including underground barriers, advanced sensor systems, and possibly deploying international supervision forces. Nonetheless, retaining IDF forces is seen as a critical measure by Israeli leadership despite opposition from Egyptian mediators and missing out on a previous slight compromise to withdraw partially, an effort encouraged by U.S. President Joe Biden for more flexibility.
The Path Forward
The decision sets a firm tone in Israel’s approach to ensuring its national security is prioritized while continuing negotiations that indicate an improved strategic advantage over Hamas. The move signals Israel’s commitment to robust security measures and its unyielding focus on the safety and repatriation of hostages while negotiating from a position of strength.
This story was first published on ynetnews.com.