Overview
Amid the ongoing war with Hamas, opinions arise concerning the necessity of a singular military and government extending from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River in Israel, based on historical mandates and the current geopolitical landscape.
Why it Matters
The resonance of League of Nations’ 1922 Mandate articles that oppose foreign control and advocate Jewish settlement in Palestine influences today’s discussions on the future state of Israeli sovereignty amid conflict with Hamas.
Key Highlights
- Recent outbreaks of violence in Gaza escalate to levels reminiscent of historical conflict.
- Amid mingled opinions on ‘the day after,’ internal efforts attempt to disparage the IDF’s sacrifices as mere propaganda for Hamas.
- The conference in Jerusalem proposes resettlement in Gaza, aligning with traditional Zionist visions, rejecting foreign-control concepts, and suggesting Israeli settlement as the most pragmatic future.
- Opposing ideologies debate between the Greater Israel ethos and proposals for a Palestinian state, with historical documents suggesting preference for a singular military and governmental presence.
The Bigger Picture
This perspective regards a single military and government rule across Israel’s territorial range, from the sea to Jordan, as imperative for both safeguarding recent war achievements and ensuring long-term stability—reflecting a century-old understanding with riveting relevance today.
The Op-Ed View
With growing concern over the unity and defensive strategy of Israel, Simcha Rothman articulates the call for solidifying Israeli governance to ensure future peace and stability, whilst drawing from historical documents and recent events as a basis for this strategy.
This story was first published on jpost.com.