More
    HomeMicro NewsPoliticsIsraeli Professor Quits Columbia, Citing Anti-Israel Bias

    Israeli Professor Quits Columbia, Citing Anti-Israel Bias

    Published on

    What it’s about

    Professor Avi Friedman, an esteemed Israeli-American academic at Columbia University’s Business School, has decided to resign. He cites a perceivable “systematic anti-Israel atmosphere” at the university as the driving factor, spotlighting contentious administrative appointments.

    Why it matters

    This move brings attention to the larger debate surrounding academic freedom and the representation of Israeli perspectives in higher education. It signals discomfort among some faculty and students about Columbia’s institutional decisions post-October 7 attacks, stressing the importance of evaluating how universities address politically charged issues.

    The Details

    Professor Avi Friedman’s resignation was primarily triggered by Columbia University’s appointment of Professor Joseph Massad—a known critic of Israel and Zionism—to teach a course on Zionism. Massad’s controversial comments praising a Hamas assault as an “impressive achievement” further intensified Friedman’s call to conscience, resulting in his departure.

    Wider Impact

    The decision to appoint Professor Massad has elicited backlash from Jewish faculty, alumni, and donors. Comparisons have been made, likening it to allowing an individual of extreme opposing ideological beliefs to teach on highly sensitive subjects. This controversy emphasizes the crucial, ongoing debate regarding freedom of speech and ideological balance in educational settings.

    Discussions and Reactions

    Despite significant pressure from external groups to rescind the appointment, Columbia University stands firm, emphasizing protecting academic freedom and open dialogue. In contrast, Professor Friedman criticized this stance, finding the university’s responses lacking in addressing the community’s concerns.

    The Bigger Picture

    Professor Friedman’s resignation not only highlights specific tensions within Columbia University but also symbolizes broader issues faced by Israeli and pro-Israeli advocates in academia worldwide, urging institutions to acknowledge diverse international perspectives constructively.

    This story was first published on ynetnews.com.

    More like this

    Israel’s Strategic Military Position Shines on Mount Hermon Visit

    Israel strengthens security on Mount Hermon with IDF posts to counter threats and safeguard borders after Assad regime's collapse.

    Netanyahu Denies ‘Qatar-Gate’ Claims, Sues Ex-Defense Minister

    Netanyahu denies Qatar-Gate allegations, sues Ya'alon; ongoing investigation could impact leadership amid political tension.

    World Zionist Congress Elections Crucial for Israel’s Future

    The World Zionist Congress election directs $5 billion in Israel, shaping its future amidst diverse agendas following Hamas's invasion.