What it is about
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has declared Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law. This decision was made amidst escalating regional tensions and frequent terrorist attacks against Israel.
Why it matters
This ruling ignores the historical and legal context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, undermines Israel’s security concerns, and contributes to international biases against Israel. The timing of this opinion can also exacerbate the current conflict. Israel relies on these settlements for security, acting as buffers against terrorism. The ICJ’s decision effectively undermines these critical security measures without offering any viable alternatives.
Driving the news
The ICJ’s opinion comes during a volatile period marked by Yemeni Houthi drone strikes and continuous missile attacks from Lebanon. These violent acts necessitate reinforced security, making the Islamic Court’s ruling appear out-of-touch and politically motivated. The UN General Assembly’s request to the ICJ also exhibits longstanding anti-Israel biases, further undermining the credibility of international bodies.
The big picture
This decision is another instance in a troubling pattern where Israel faces international condemnation while justifiably defending its territory and citizens. Historical incidents such as delayed support during the Yom Kippur War, the hasty Iran Nuclear Deal of 2015, and the biased 2016 UN Security Council Resolution 2334 reflect this trend. Even the 2001 Durban Conference showcased an anti-Israel agenda, setting the precedent for biased judgments like the current ICJ ruling.
Between the lines
The ruling neglects the deep-rooted Jewish ties to East Jerusalem and the critical role played by Israeli settlements in safeguarding civilian lives. It calls for dismantling these settlements without offering any security guarantees, mirroring Western tendencies to prioritize political gains over Israel’s legitimate security concerns.
The bottom line
True peace solutions require nuanced and balanced direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, free from external pressures and biased international opinions. The ICJ’s advisory opinion is not about justice but rather politics, setting a dangerous precedent for global diplomacy.
خ
This story was first published on jpost.com.