What’s happening:

As the conflict with Hamas extends into its 61st day, Israel is being advised to develop a comprehensive plan for Gaza’s future. This day after strategy should be designed to ensure ongoing support from the United States.

Why it matters:

The U.S. has been a staunch ally to Israel during the conflict, emphasizing the importance of defeating Hamas. However, American officials are seeking clarity on Israel’s long-term intentions for the region post-conflict. The absence of a clear Israeli vision for governance and security in Gaza could potentially weaken the robust U.S. support Israel currently enjoys.

The American stance:

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has publicly conveyed America’s desire for a unified Gaza and West Bank under the Palestinian Authority (PA). The U.S. envisions a scenario where the PA is reformed and empowered to govern effectively. Yet, this perspective has been criticized for overlooking the PA’s shortcomings, including its failure to suppress terrorism and its history of inciting violence against Israel.

Israel’s position:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the idea of the PA taking control of Gaza after the war. He has emphasized the PA’s track record of funding terrorism and fostering anti-Israel sentiment. While Netanyahu agrees that Gaza should be demilitarized with Israeli Defense Forces retaining security oversight, details on governance and reconstruction remain vague.

The bottom line:

Israel is encouraged to articulate a detailed post-war vision for Gaza. Such clarity would not only facilitate sustained U.S. backing but would also demonstrate Israel’s commitment to establishing a stable and secure future for the region. Without this, Israel risks its strategic relationship with the U.S. and the perception of its role in the region’s future stability.

This story was first published on jpost.com.