The Essentials

The provocative behavior of Iran is reaching a critical streak, mandating a strategic combination of external military tactics and leveraging Iran’s populace for an uprising against Tehran’s current trajectory toward region-wide control and assertion of religious dominance.

Why It Matters

As Amotz Asa-El opines in the Jerusalem Post, pre-emptive action should hover less on occupation and more on supporting internal Iranian dissent to assure the fall of the regime without causing an extensive conflict that entangles external nations heavily into Iran’s complex social and geographic fabrics.

The Framework

How should the West respond to aggressive Iranian stratagems? Asa-El proposes an actionable strategy rooted in principled military intervention combined with concurrent support of Iran’s silenced civilian opposition, aiming to uproot tyrannical leaders and halt further destabilization without initiating a ground war.

Talking Tactics

The stories of Iranian-influenced disturbances— from sponsoring attacks on US troops to threatening commercial shipping—are not just cries for opposition but vivid proof of Tehran’s declaration of war, pushing adversaries on setting a plan of attack that undermines Iran’s military might while avoiding a manpower-driven occupation.

Inside vs. Outside

Targeting the framework of Iran’s regime — both the masterminds and their instrumental machinery — while profoundly reinforcing the morale and capacity of oppressed Iranian citizens stands out as the most feasible direction to hollow out the belligerent project framed by Tehran’s authoritative rule.

Long-term Implications

Under the projection that the West, principally led by America and its European allies, could thwart Iran’s aging but numerous military resources and advance tactical maneuvers, a broader campaign of subtle yet deadly incisions into the establishment could set the stage for an upwelling of revolution by Iran’s population desperate for change.

In Conclusion

A meticulous blend of precision-targeted intervention, as suggested by Asa-El, married with internal defiance by the subjugated Iranian crowd, might hold the secret to redeeming Iran not through unwanted conquest but through a rather strategic dismantling of a regime long due in its expiry.

This story was first published on jpost.com.