What this is about
Stanley and Joyce Boim, parents of David Boim who was tragically killed by Hamas terrorists in 1996, are suing the American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) under allegations of supporting Hamas through material means. The case reignites as AMP and other anti-Israel groups plan to protest at the Democratic National Convention (DNC).
Why it matters
This legal battle highlights the ongoing fight against organizations believed to be supporting terrorist activities under the guise of advocacy and community mobilization. Victory for the Boim family would ensure that groups cannot evade responsibility by rebranding and continuing their previous operations, thus strengthening anti-terrorism laws and protections.
The big picture
The Boim family’s suit against AMP underscores a critical stance against anti-Israel sentiment and holds organizations accountable for any direct or indirect support of terrorism. It serves as a reminder that material support for terrorist entities will not be tolerated, ensuring justice is served for victims like David Boim.
Details
In 2000, the Boims filed a successful lawsuit against several Islamic charities in the U.S., resulting in a $156 million judgement, which remained unpaid as the organizations disbanded. Their continued legal pursuit argues that the same entities have resurfaced under new names, continuing operations closely aligned with Hamas ideology.
The AMP claims to focus on advocating for Palestinian rights, but the Boims argue the group’s leadership and agenda remain fundamentally the same as the disbanded Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP). The case emphasizes the importance of holding entities accountable to ensure they do not continue harmful activities under new guises.
What’s next
Protests by AMP and other anti-Israel groups at the DNC will bring additional attention to the ongoing legal case, influencing public opinion and possibly affecting the litigation’s outcomes. The Boim family and their legal team aim to bring a significant blow against groups providing material support to terrorists, ensuring such actions are met with stringent legal consequences.
The bottom line
This case serves as a pivotal moment in the fight against terrorism support networks in the United States. By holding organizations like AMP accountable, the Boim family’s legal battle stands not only as a quest for justice for their son but as a firm stance against the proliferation of terror-supportive entities.
This story was first published on foxnews.com.