What’s happening:
Addressing global leaders at the World Economic Forum, getting personal with the example of a kidnapped child, President Isaac Herzog of Israel emphasizes the current Israeli sentiment on the peace process with Palestinians is despairing, as people are more focused on ensuring future safety.
Why it matters:
Herzog’s comments reflect the significant shift in the Israeli public psyche post-October 7 attacks which claimed over a thousand lives, suggesting that before any peace process considerations, Israel’s guarantee of security takes precedence in the collective mindset.
The backdrop:
These observations follow recently declined proposals involving normalization with Saudi Arabia tied to advancements toward Palestinian statehood, signifying Israel’s skepticism of peace offers given the association of praise for violence within Palestinian discourse.
Global Implications:
The president acknowledges a larger regional conflict, highlighting the threat Iran poses, and suggests collective action. Beyond the domestic aspect, Herzog implicates this fight as part of a broader safeguarding effort commanding a unifying international response.
Beyond the conflict:
Hamas remains the central adversarial force, with expectations for its upheaval a precondition for any progressive change for Palestinian territories. Multinational involvement in Gaza’s rebuilding is envisioned, though without Palestinian Authority control.
The humanitarian grain:
While discussing the necessities of war, attention turns to humanitarian aspects, focusing on the plight of Israeli hostages including Kfir Bibas, whose medical and general urgent needs are put forth against worsening conditions under captivity.
Gaza’s Future:
In diplomatic circles and through events like Davos, the conversation often turns to what a post-war Gaza will need. With skepticism from Arab states and insists on stringent security conduct from Israel, Herzog indicates a collective, detail-oriented approach to addressing Gaza’s future despite divergent international engagement levels.
Bottom line:
Perspectives from political events such as Davos reveal intrinsic dynamics defining Israel’s stance. Amid hostilities and healing, Israel pursues a balance through a strong stance on security and a cry for substantial collective action regarding its opposed neighbor, Iran, and the proxy conflicts surrounding it.
This story was first published on timesofisrael.com.