What happened
Rabbi Ari Jun, initially invited to speak against neo-Nazism and white supremacy at a rally in Cincinnati, was later excluded due to his Zionist identity. Despite his commitment to social justice and experience with combating antisemitism, organizers of the rally decided his values did not align with those of the event.
Why it matters
This incident underscores the growing tensions between parts of the progressive movement and segments of the Jewish community over Zionism. It highlights how, despite a shared opposition to hatred, misunderstanding and exclusion can occur within diverse coalitions dedicated to justice and equality.
Driving the news
Queen City United, the group organizing the rally, clarified that Zionism’s inclusion would dilute the aims of the demonstration, which is staunchly against Nazis and white supremacy. This decision reflects a broader trend where progressive spaces sometimes expect denouncement of Israel’s policies — a move that can marginalize those who identify as Zionists.
The perspective
Rabbi Jun identifies as a liberal Zionist, which places him among the 80% of U.S. Jews who, according to Pew Research, regard Israel as an important aspect of their Jewish identity. His experience illustrates the delicate balance many progressive Jews navigate between supporting progressive values and maintaining their connection to Israel.
Between the lines
The decision to disinvite Jun has sparked a wide array of reactions. Some view it as a necessary stance against broader injustices, while others worry it signals an unacceptable breach of inclusivity. This echo across social media reflects a struggle within the progressive movement to reconcile various viewpoints on Zionism and its relationship to issues of racism and oppression.
Looking ahead
Meetings like this illustrate the challenging path toward social change, as different marginalized communities seek to coexist and collaborate. This incident could foster deeper discussions around how inclusivity can truly be achieved while respecting diverse identities and loyalties. As dialogues continue, the potential for reconciling these differences offers an opportunity for more robust unity in fighting oppression and injustice.
This story was first published on timesofisrael.com.