What it’s about:
Hamas has once again demonstrated its cruel and inhumane tactics by staging shocking public displays in Gaza. These acts have included the disrespectful parading of coffins of Israeli victims and coercing released hostages to act against their will. This brutality contrasts sharply with the values upheld by civilized societies, causing widespread outrage and condemnation, especially in Israel and the allied West.
Why it matters:
These horrific demonstrations by Hamas underline a continued and pressing threat that looms not only over Israel but also highlights ideologies that are disturbingly supported by parts of the international community. It emphasizes the ripple effect of extremism and the challenge it presents to global peace and stability.
Driving the news:
Recent events have shown Hamas indulging in disturbing displays that involved humiliating released hostages and desecrating the dignity of the deceased Israeli citizens. Such acts cannot be considered in isolation. These actions reflect Hamas’s broader ideology that echoes the cruelty witnessed during the October 7 massacre.
The big picture:
The larger issue lies in acknowledging that these actions emanate from a deeply entrenched ideology supported by millions in the global arena. Despite not everyone in Gaza endorsing Hamas’s methods, these radical and extremist views are unparalleled for their savagery and present a challenge to international norms of humanity and dignity.
What they’re saying:
US National Security Advisor Mike Waltz compared Hamas to extremist entities like ISIS and emphasized that Hamas must be eradicated. There is public discourse pointing out the unrealistic expectation of peaceful coexistence with an organization committed to Israel’s destruction. As the situation unfolds, the emphasis continues on standing by Israel in the pursuit of peace and territorial protection.
The bottom line:
For Israel, tolerating violent neighbors seeking its destruction is untenable. The ongoing support Hamas receives internationally underscores the necessity for a strategic response. The world must recognize that calls for actions like “From the river to the sea” are not cries for justice but are implicit endorsements of violence against innocent lives.
This story was first published on jpost.com.