More
    HomeMicro NewsPoliticsIsrael Adapts U.S. War on Terror Tactics to Combat Iranian Threats

    Israel Adapts U.S. War on Terror Tactics to Combat Iranian Threats

    Published on

    What it is about

    As the United States marks three years since its withdrawal from Afghanistan, Israel looks to extract vital lessons from the U.S. War on Terror to bolster its ongoing fight against Iranian-backed terrorist organizations.

    Why it matters

    The outcome of Israel’s struggle against terrorist organizations supported by Iran has significant implications not just for Israeli security but for regional stability as a whole. By understanding and adapting strategies used in the U.S. War on Terror, Israel can better navigate its own security challenges.

    The broader context

    The conclusion of America’s longest war in Afghanistan in August 2021 raised questions about the efficacy of the U.S.’s counterterrorism strategy. Such questions are pertinent for Israel, which faces multiple threats from terrorist factions funded by Iran. For Israel, the stakes are existential. Its battle against organizations like Hamas, Hezbollah, and other extremist groups is crucial for its survival.

    Expert insights

    Jonathan Conricus, former spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), underscores that Israel’s fight against terrorism is not just a conflict but a matter of national existence. Conricus highlighted, “The question is not whether militant groups can be defeated—they certainly can and are being defeated by Israel. The real challenge is how to change hearts and minds and put an end to recruits ready to join these terrorist ranks.”

    Key strategies and challenges

    One of the significant distinctions between the U.S. and Israel’s counterterrorism efforts is their proximity to the threats. Israel is besieged by nearly 20 terrorist organizations operating close to its borders, posing immediate dangers. The IDF veteran added, “We are fighting for our very existence, unlike the U.S., Israel’s conflict is a zero-sum game—we either fight and exist, or we don’t.” Conricus advocates for a robust, multi-faceted approach, including leveraging advanced intelligence and technological innovation, curbing Iran’s influence, and fostering regional cooperation.

    Looking ahead

    Retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen Charles Moore emphasizes that defeating terrorism cannot rely on military might alone but must also involve building a palatable, peaceful governance system post-conflict. Israel, with the help of the U.S., must collaboratively work on addressing socio-economic factors to prevent radicalization. Moore stated, “Decisive military action to eliminate threats must be combined with steps to improve living conditions and regional economic cooperation to ensure a ‘fair and lasting peace.'”

    The Iranian Factor

    The strategy extends beyond immediate military challenges to include addressing Iran’s role in financing and supporting terrorist organizations. Strict sanctions and greater international resolve against Tehran could deter this funding, as Conricus argues. “For too long, Iran has had the resources and leisure to fund terror organizations. A total reassessment of Israel’s strategy towards Iran is needed to ensure security in the region.”

    The idea of a Coalition

    Conricus also suggests forming a coalition of willing nations dedicated to combatting radicalization and promoting regional stability. “With the right vision and leadership, cooperation among Israel, the U.S., and other willing countries could be transformational,” he said.

    What’s Next?

    Despite ongoing international scrutiny over Israel’s military actions, including the recent high civilian casualty rates in Gaza, Israeli leaders’ consensus underscores the necessity for continued efforts until terrorist groups like Hamas are completely eradicated. The ultimate aim for Israel, Williams underlines, is survival—_; “Unlike for the U.S., it’s very much a zero-sum game – we either fight and exist or we cease to exist,” Conricus said.

    This story was first published on foxnews.com.

    More like this

    Israeli Public Suspects Politics in Defense Ministry Shakeup, Poll Shows

    Channel 13 poll: 63% of Israelis think Netanyahu's potential firing of Defense Minister Gallant is politically motivated, risking national security perception.

    Israeli Political Shifts: Controversies, Diplomacy, and Social Progress

    Israeli political landscape faces shifts with critiques on Netanyahu and Edelstein. Arrests of women activists spark debate; international and diplomatic moves evolve.

    Liberal Democrat Tayab Ali Criticizes Israeli Policies at Event

    Tayab Ali criticizes Israel's West Bank policies at a Liberal Democrat event, linking them to October 7's tragic events, sparking controversy over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.