What it’s about

Democratic party members are expressing divided opinions following the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and high-ranking Hamas leaders. While some lawmakers criticize the decision as politically motivated, others call for a reassessment of U.S. involvement in alleged human rights abuses.

Why it matters

The ICC’s decision has significant implications for international law, U.S.-Israeli relations, and the perception of Israel’s defense measures against Hamas. Oscillating views within the Democratic party underscore broader political controversies around Middle East policies and human rights considerations.

What they’re saying

Rep. Richie Torres: “Political Retribution Against Israel”

Representative Richie Torres from New York criticized the ICC decision, emphasizing that Israel is not a member of the ICC and thus dismissing the court’s jurisdiction. Torres argued that the move is “retribution against Israel for the original sin of existing as a Jewish State” and defending itself amid unprecedented aggression from Hamas.

“Today’s decision effectively criminalizes the state of Israel’s defensive actions against an adversary deeply embedded within a civilian population,” Torres asserted. He further blamed Hamas for escalating conflict in Gaza, which has resulted in substantial humanitarian crises.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: “End U.S. Funding”

Conversely, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, known for her critical views on Israel, echoed support for the ICC’s actions. She emphasized the need to terminate U.S. funding for activities that involve human rights abuses, accusing Israel of “genocide” and a “forced famine.”

“What’s occurring in Gaza and the West Bank must not be facilitated using U.S. resources,” Ocasio-Cortez insisted, approving the ICC’s allegations against both Hamas and Israeli leadership for instigating regional hostilities.

The broader context

This divide among Democratic lawmakers reflects wider tensions within the U.S. political landscape concerning Israel and Palestine. The stance of the ICC and its pursuit of legal actions against world leaders deepens the complexity surrounding international and diplomatic responses to the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Editor’s note

The ongoing debate reflects the varied approaches within the U.S. political community on how to balance support for Israel while addressing human rights allegations. It is essential to recognize Israel’s right to self-defense amid hostilities initiated by groups like Hamas that impose severe threats onto civilian areas.

This story was first published on foxnews.com.