What’s happening:
At a recent press conference, US President Joe Biden made remarks interpreted by many as a criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza, stating that “the conduct of the response in Gaza” had been “over the top.” Reflecting on recent conversations with international leaders, and emphasizing the need for humanitarian efforts, his comments were made in the greater context of the tensions following a Hamas terrorist attack and subsequent negotiations.
Why it matters:
Biden’s critique matters because it illustrates the growing pressure within domestic and international spheres calling for a reassessment of Israel’s military conduct in Gaza and potentially shifts the stances regarding US-Israeli relations. It aligns with recent actions taken by his administration, such as the requirement for allies to provide assurances of adherence to international and human rights law in receipt of military aid.
The Big Picture:
The President’s comments encompass a larger dialogue on foreign aid accountability and the responsibility to protect civilians in conflict areas. Amid the condemnation of Hamas terrorist actions and support for Israel’s right to self-defense, there’s a nuanced challenge to balance military strategy with humanitarian considerations.
Details:
Biden referred to ongoing intense diplomatic efforts to get humanitarian aid into Gaza, addressing both international leaders and key players in the region to acquire a cease-fire agreement. Israeli military action in response to Hamas terrorism was also suggested to be overly severe, questioning the proportionality and intended longevity of Gaza’s conditions post-conflict.
Background:
The context for these comments is soaked in the aftermath of a significant Hamas-led attack via infiltration on October 7, causing massive casualties. Israel’s comprehensive military campaign targeting Hamas also drew criticism due to a high Palestinian casualty rate as reported by the Gazan authorities, a figure that involves Hamas combatants and civilian deaths attributed to misfire accidents.
U.S. posture:
Originally exhibiting robust support for Israel post-attack, including military deterrence gestures, the Biden administration is now advocating for Israel to engage in peace processes and consider humane treatment and future governance for the people of Gaza. Biden’s construal signals edging towards a strategy that reconciles self-defense with facilitation of conditions conducive to a peaceful two-state settlement.
Next steps:
Looking forward, Biden urges more efficient humanitarian efforts paired with strategic engagement with the aim of imposing a durable cease-fire between Israel and Hamas factions. Measures include inter-departmental reporting on allies’ compliance with international laws within military alliances and considerations of linking military aid to these compliances.
This story was first published on timesofisrael.com.